LAGGING RADIUS and PALAEODENSITY
By Eugene A. Ellis (updated Sept. 2020)
Finding a radius to match the mass on an exponentially expanding earth at past times is difficult because the volume (radius) increase always follows or lags behind the increasing mass due to the effects of density and gravity. Depending on the lag time, one can approximate past radii by starting with the equations that produced Table 5 and its Figure 4 graph. The exponential growth of the mass is derived from the 8-elements accumulating mass by converting energy of decay. The following tables and charts indicate the effects from incrementally lagging of the radius. The 10 slides below demonstrate as the lag time shortens, density tends toward unity while the radius and gravity curves merge together. Here, the percentage of present gravity is equal to the radius percentage at any particular past time. When earth’s gravity was half of today’s gravity, the radius was 50% of today’s radius (x% g = x% r).
Not knowing the palaeodensity at certain past times is not knowing the palaeoradius and palaeogravity for that same time.
On an Ionic Growing Earth (IGE) the density of each of the 8-abundance elements comprising 98.8% of earth’s matter is unchanging. Growing elements confined within and under the continental and oceanic crusts are temporarily compressed until the pressure is relieved by cracking, expanding, or stretching the shell (earthquakes, volcanos, traps, cracks, etc.).
The expansions changing the density of chemical compounds and minerals (the building blocks of rocks) formed naturally by successive stages of elemental ionization within the earth are likewise suppressed by the high temperatures and pressures encountered in the core and mantle. When the temperatures and pressures are relieved in the upper mantle or crust, these combined elements and minerals structurally expand revealing specific densities.
The colors on the Rainbow Map display the sequential placement of density layers where an ocean floor cracks and spreads apart. These shell layers also involve combinational joining of growing elements and minerals displaying molecular volume increases that changes density. A better geological chronology may be obtained when the origin of the heat and pressures within the planet (the cause) becomes known (https://sciencewoke.org/age-of-the-ocean-floor-a-critical-analysis/).
Except in the crust and upper-most mantle found in the outermost 1% of earth’s radius (~64 km), the density of the planet is unchanging. Using the atomic mass of the abundance elements and knowing when each is growing and not growing (see Fig. 1r in the above link) as exemplified by their Ionization Potentials (I.P.), one can retrodict the radius and surface gravity based upon the growing mass for any geological time determined by radiometric dating or other means when ignoring density. In this manner, density would equal unity (1) and percent gravity equaling percent radius (x% g = x% r) would be at least 99% accurate. Additional accuracy could be obtained using (x) % gravity equaling (x-1) % radius for a slightly larger earth that includes mineral expansions; i.e. 50% g = 49% r. Inflating the radius has zero effect on gravity.
By Eugene A. Ellis (updated Sept. 2020)
Finding a radius to match the mass on an exponentially expanding earth at past times is difficult because the volume (radius) increase always follows or lags behind the increasing mass due to the effects of density and gravity. Depending on the lag time, one can approximate past radii by starting with the equations that produced Table 5 and its Figure 4 graph. The exponential growth of the mass is derived from the 8-elements accumulating mass by converting energy of decay. The following tables and charts indicate the effects from incrementally lagging of the radius. The 10 slides below demonstrate as the lag time shortens, density tends toward unity while the radius and gravity curves merge together. Here, the percentage of present gravity is equal to the radius percentage at any particular past time. When earth’s gravity was half of today’s gravity, the radius was 50% of today’s radius (x% g = x% r).
Not knowing the palaeodensity at certain past times is not knowing the palaeoradius and palaeogravity for that same time.
On an Ionic Growing Earth (IGE) the density of each of the 8-abundance elements comprising 98.8% of earth’s matter is unchanging. Growing elements confined within and under the continental and oceanic crusts are temporarily compressed until the pressure is relieved by cracking, expanding, or stretching the shell (earthquakes, volcanos, traps, cracks, etc.).
The expansions changing the density of chemical compounds and minerals (the building blocks of rocks) formed naturally by successive stages of elemental ionization within the earth are likewise suppressed by the high temperatures and pressures encountered in the core and mantle. When the temperatures and pressures are relieved in the upper mantle or crust, these combined elements and minerals structurally expand revealing specific densities.
The colors on the Rainbow Map display the sequential placement of density layers where an ocean floor cracks and spreads apart. These shell layers also involve combinational joining of growing elements and minerals displaying molecular volume increases that changes density. A better geological chronology may be obtained when the origin of the heat and pressures within the planet (the cause) becomes known (https://sciencewoke.org/age-of-the-ocean-floor-a-critical-analysis/).
Except in the crust and upper-most mantle found in the outermost 1% of earth’s radius (~64 km), the density of the planet is unchanging. Using the atomic mass of the abundance elements and knowing when each is growing and not growing (see Fig. 1r in the above link) as exemplified by their Ionization Potentials (I.P.), one can retrodict the radius and surface gravity based upon the growing mass for any geological time determined by radiometric dating or other means when ignoring density. In this manner, density would equal unity (1) and percent gravity equaling percent radius (x% g = x% r) would be at least 99% accurate. Additional accuracy could be obtained using (x) % gravity equaling (x-1) % radius for a slightly larger earth that includes mineral expansions; i.e. 50% g = 49% r. Inflating the radius has zero effect on gravity.
lagging_radius_and_palaeodensity.pdf | |
File Size: | 2910 kb |
File Type: |